How is it possible to hold both joy and sorrow?

Lately, my thoughts have felt full of contradictions—hope and fear, trust and uncertainty, peace and anxiety—all coexisting in the same space. Part of me wonders if something is wrong with that. Shouldn’t faith feel more settled? More resolved?

And yet, when I look to Jesus, I see something different.
The cross itself holds what seems impossible to reconcile. It carries both death and life, suffering and joy, defeat and victory. It is not one or the other. It is both, at the same time.

Jesus Himself did not approach the cross with detached acceptance. In the garden, He asked for it to pass. There was real anguish, real desire for another way. And still, He endured it.

Not because it was easy, but because He trusted the Father.
He suffered. He died. And He rose again—that I may live.
He lives now. In me.

There is something about this that both comforts and unsettles me.

It comforts me because it means I do not have to resolve everything I feel into one clean emotion. I do not have to pretend that sorrow disappears just because I trust God. I do not have to suppress my questions in order to appear faithful.

But it unsettles me because this kind of faith is not simple.

It is not about having clarity.
It is not about knowing outcomes.
It is not even about feeling at peace all the time.
It is about following Someone whose character I trust…
even when I do not understand where He is leading.

I find myself repeating this quietly:

Only by looking to Jesus.
Only by fixing my gaze on Him.
Only by following Him.
Only by trusting Him.

It sounds simple. And in some ways, it is.

He is good.
He is kind.
He is gentle.
He is trustworthy.

And yet, it is also deeply difficult.

Because I do not see where He is going.
I do not understand what He is doing.

There is a question I cannot avoid right now.

Can I honestly say, “It is well with my soul,” no matter the outcome?

I want to say yes.

But if I am being truthful, I find myself pausing.

Not because I do not trust God. But because I am still aware of what I am hoping for.

I want a specific outcome.
I want good news.
I want this prayer to be answered in the way I have been quietly longing for.

And so I am learning that surrender is not the absence of desire.

It is the placing of that desire before God.

Not denying it.
Not suppressing it.
But offering it, honestly.

So, instead of forcing a declaration I am not fully ready to make, I find myself praying something simpler and perhaps more real:

Psalm 139:23–24
Search me, O God, and know my heart;
test me and know my anxious thoughts.
Point out anything in me that offends you,
and lead me along the path of everlasting life.

This is not a prayer of resolution.

It is a prayer of exposure.

It is not saying, “I am already at peace.”

It is saying, “Show me what is in me. Lead me where I cannot yet see.”

Maybe this is what it means to hold joy and sorrow together.
Not to resolve them.
Not to choose one over the other.
But to carry both, honestly, before God.

To hope. And still acknowledge fear.
To trust. And still admit uncertainty.
To follow. Even when the path is unclear.

Because faith, at its core, is not certainty about outcomes.
It is commitment under uncertainty.

And so I come back to this:

I trust You, Lord Jesus.
Not because everything makes sense.
Not because I feel completely at peace.
But because You are who You are.
And perhaps, for now, that is enough.

Even here.

Leave a comment

Share

I was listening to the Gospel of John when the account of Jesus’ conversation with the Samaritan woman drew my attention. I continued listening to the chapters that followed, but my mind and heart had already stopped at that conversation.

It wasn’t the first time I had heard this story. But this time, it held me.

So I returned to it. I sat with it. I studied it.

The questions that came to mind were these:
Was there a movement to the Samaritan woman’s questions to Jesus? Why were those her questions? What was the movement of Jesus’ responses to her? And where do I situate myself in this story?

Naming the Movements

As I sat with the passage, I began to notice that this was not a random exchange. There was a movement both in the Samaritan woman’s questions and in Jesus’ responses.

The Movement of the Woman’s Questions

Her questions seem to unfold in a progression:

• She begins with distance:
  “Why are you talking to me?”
  She names the boundaries — Jew and Samaritan, man and woman.

• She moves to challenge:
  “Do you think you are greater than our ancestor Jacob?”
  She is no longer just surprised; she is evaluating Jesus’ claim.

• Then to theological engagement:
  “Where should we worship?”
  Whether out of genuine curiosity or subtle deflection, she shifts the conversation to a longstanding religious debate.

• And finally to tentative openness:
  “Could this be the Messiah?”
  Not a declaration, but not dismissal either — a question that leaves space.

Her questions move from guarded distance → cautious engagement → partial recognition.

The Movement of Jesus’ Responses

Jesus’ responses move differently:

• He begins with an invitation:
  “If you knew the gift of God…”
  He introduces a reality she does not yet understand.

• He then redefines her need:
  Not physical water, but something deeper — living water that addresses a different kind of thirst.

• He moves to personal revelation:
  Naming her life, not to condemn, but to uncover what lies beneath the surface.

• He then reorients her theology:
  Moving the question from where to worship to how — in spirit and in truth.

• And finally, He gives direct self-revelation:
  “I who speak to you am He.”

Jesus’ movement is from invitation → exposure → reorientation → revelation.

Placing Them Side by Side

When I place these movements side by side, something becomes clear:

She is moving toward understanding,
while Jesus is moving toward revealing.

She asks from within her framework,
while Jesus responds by expanding it.

She begins with categories — ethnic, social, theological —
but Jesus keeps drawing her beyond them.

But this is not just a pattern to observe. It is a conversation that takes place in a real moment, in a real place, under the heat of the day, beside a well.

The Setting: An Unexpected Encounter

We read of Jesus passing through Samaria on His way to Galilee. It says that He ‘had to’ go through Samaria.

Perhaps it was simply geographic.
Or perhaps it was something more, something intentional, even necessary, within His mission.

He and His disciples arrive at Sychar, a Samaritan village. Tired from the journey, Jesus sits beside a well while His disciples go into the village to buy food.

At noon, a Samaritan woman comes to draw water.

There is no explicit mention that Jesus was thirsty, yet He asks her for a drink.

She is surprised.

In my own words: “Why are you talking to me?”

She is a Samaritan. A woman. And she is alone at noon — a detail that quietly invites social and moral suspicion, since women typically came together earlier or later in the day to draw water.

So her question is not casual. It is boundary-setting.

Misunderstanding and Invitation

Jesus responds:

“If you only knew the gift of God and who it is that is speaking to you, you would have asked me, and I would have given you living water.”

Her reply, again in my own words:

“Who do you think you are? Do you think you are greater than our ancestor Jacob? You don’t even have anything to draw water with, how can you give me water?”

Jesus clarifies:

“Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, but whoever drinks the water I give will never thirst…”

At this point, something may be stirring in her.

She asks Him for this water — so she will not be thirsty and will not have to keep coming back to the well.

But she still seems to be thinking in physical terms. The mention of eternal life does not fully register. Her response carries a mixture of openness and misunderstanding. At this stage, we cannot be entirely certain.

Being Known Without Condemnation

Then Jesus shifts the conversation:

“Go, call your husband.”

She replies that she has no husband.

Jesus affirms this and reveals her relational history.

Notably, there is no explicit condemnation.

At this point, two things seem to happen.

First, she may feel exposed — and so she deflects.
Second, she turns to theology.

From Debate to True Worship

She acknowledges Jesus as a prophet and raises a longstanding dispute:

Where is the proper place of worship? Mount Gerizim or Jerusalem?

It is striking that she returns to the same boundary markers she raised at the beginning.

But Jesus does not engage the debate on its terms.

He reframes it entirely:

The time is coming — and is now here — when true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth.

Worship is no longer about location. It is about relationship and reality — about being drawn into what God Himself is doing.

Revelation to the Unexpected

She says:

“I know that Messiah is coming…”

And Jesus responds:

“I who speak to you am He.”

This direct self-revelation is given not to a religious leader, not to a disciple, but to a Samaritan, a woman, an outsider.

From Encounter to Invitation

She leaves her water jar — seemingly forgetting the very reason she came to the well — and returns to the village.

She tells the people:

“Come, see a man who told me everything I ever did. Could this be the Messiah?”

In Greek, the phrasing suggests hesitation:

“This couldn’t be the Messiah… could it?”

She does not sound certain, even after Jesus’ own self-revelation.

And yet, she goes.
She tells others.
She invites them to see for themselves.

A Witness Still in Process

I found myself wondering why she is often described as the first evangelist.

She does not present a clear confession.
She does not offer a structured theology.
She does not even sound convinced.

And yet, because of her invitation, many Samaritans come to Jesus.

They first believe because of her testimony. But then they say:

“Now we believe… because we have heard for ourselves.”

They arrive at their own conviction.

Locating Myself in the Story

And perhaps this is where I begin to situate myself in the story.

I recognize something of her in me.

The questions that begin with distance.
The need to evaluate before trusting.
The tendency to move into theology when things feel too personal.
The slow, uneven movement toward recognition.

Jesus does not wait for clarity before engaging her.
He meets her in the middle of her questions.

She may have been coming to that well daily, weary of having to come at noon just to avoid the stares, the murmurs, the distance others kept. Or perhaps it was the first time she came alone, after enduring judgment she could no longer bear.

But Jesus met her there.
Not by accident. Not as interruption.

He met her when she did not plan it,
when she did not expect it,
when she was not ready.

And still — she went back and invited others.

Come and See

What if faith is not defined by how clearly we can explain Jesus,
but by whether we are willing to return to the village and say,

“Come and see.”

Leave a comment

Share

I haven’t been writing in a while.

At first, I wondered if it was because I had nothing new to say. Or maybe because I keep circling the same thoughts, returning to the same questions, saying the same things in slightly different ways.

And I don’t like that.

It makes me feel like I’m stuck.

The Weariness of Staying

I don’t like being here — this “in-between” season I’ve written so much about.

Not quite where I was.
Not yet where I thought I’d be.
Neither here nor there.

I used to believe I could make sense of this space. That if I understood it well enough, if I could name it, theologize it, write about it — it might become more bearable.

But understanding hasn’t made it easier.

If anything, it has made me more aware of the cost of staying.

I find myself sitting with the psalmists, with Qoheleth — not as literary companions but as mirrors. And lately, I’m tired of their company. Tired of the questions that don’t resolve. Tired of the honesty that doesn’t lead to immediate relief.

The Gift I Didn’t Expect to Miss

Strangely, this season has made me grateful for my Pentecostal background.

I didn’t expect that.

But I see now what it gave me:

• A reflex toward hope

• An instinct to expect God to move

• A way of believing that the future is not closed

Without that, I suspect I might feel more defeated. More resigned. More inclined to think that what is, is all there will ever be.

There was a clarity there, perhaps even a simplicity, that I now find myself missing.

When Openness Becomes Exhaustion

There is a downside to learning how to see from multiple perspectives.

No one tells you this part.

When everything becomes worth considering, everything also becomes heavy.

There are more questions to weigh.
More angles to hold.
More tensions to manage.

Sometimes I think it would be easier to just be of one mind. To settle into a system. To stop evaluating everything all the time.

Even if it meant being wrong.

But that thought unsettles me.

Because it reveals something I would rather not admit: that sometimes, what I long for is not truth, but relief.

The God Who Is Not Tame

I find myself thinking about God’s character more these days.

How He can be both loving and just.
Not one or the other. Both.

And if I’m honest, that frightens me.

It reminds me of Aslan, the line that says he is not a tame lion.

God is not controllable. Not someone I can reduce to what I am comfortable with.

And yet, I know He can be trusted.

That tension is not easy to live with.

Because trust, in this case, does not mean things will not hurt.

Wanting a Gentler God

There are moments when I find myself wanting a different version of God.

One who is gentle, loving, and kind — only that.

Not one who allows suffering.
Not one whose justice feels severe.
Not one whose wisdom leads me through places I would not choose.

I know the theology.

I know that I am safe from His wrath.

But safety, I am learning, does not mean ease.

This life does not offer full reprieve. Not yet.

Everything will be made beautiful — but not here, not fully, not now.

And that “not yet” is harder to live with than I expected.

When Hope Feels Distant

I often look for hope in the present.

Something tangible. Something I can feel.

Sometimes it’s there. Sometimes it isn’t.

And when it isn’t, I begin to wonder:

• Is hope actually present if I cannot feel it?

• Or have I mistaken emotional relief for something deeper?

Perhaps hope is quieter than I thought.

Perhaps it looks less like certainty, and more like continuing.

The Limits of Understanding

There are moments when I recognize the limits of my own mind.

How can a finite being fully comprehend eternity?

How can I expect to hold together everything that God is, when even Scripture itself presents Him in ways that stretch me?

There is a point where thinking no longer resolves the tension.

And I am left with a choice:

• Keep trying to understand everything

• Or learn to remain without resolution

Where I Find Myself Now

Lately, I find myself returning to one place.

Not to a system.
Not to an answer.
Not even to a fully formed theology.

But to a person.

Jesus.

If I cannot hold everything else together, I can at least look at Him.

The way He moves toward people.
The way He holds both truth and compassion.
The way He reveals God without reducing Him.

I now understand why Sarah Bessey repeatedly said in her Unexpected Series, “I’d always loved Jesus” — something I wrote about as well here.

I don’t understand everything.

But I find that I am drawn to Him, and I still want to know Him more and more.

And for now, that is where I rest.

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

Share

I read Psalm 4 the other day, several times, and I could not understand it as a whole. Poetry has never been intuitive for me. I prefer writing that is straightforward, linear, easy to follow. The psalms often resist that. They speak in images, leaps, and turns that do not immediately reveal where the prayer is going.

Eventually, after rereading and consulting a commentary, the structure became clearer. Like Psalm 3, Psalm 4 carries multiple voices — but here the shifts feel even more pronounced. David speaks to God, to others, and to himself. The psalm moves in and out of these voices with a kind of spiritual agility I often envy.

What I began to notice is this: the psalm is not primarily about emotion. It is about formation.

Addressing God: Expectation Without Drama

David begins by speaking to God with quiet confidence:
“Answer me when I call… be gracious to me and hear my prayer.”
There is no panic here, no emotional performance. Just expectation. David assumes God hears. He assumes God acts. This is not wishful thinking; it is covenant trust.

I find this challenging. I expect answers, but often with a kind of hesitant hopefulness — half-wondering whether God is listening at all. David prays with a steadiness that I do not always possess.

Addressing Others (and the Inner Opposition)

Then the psalm shifts, unexpectedly, to a different audience:
“How long will you love vain words and seek after lies?”

Commentaries differ: this could refer to actual adversaries, spiritual opposition, or the internalised voices we carry as fallen human beings. In any case, David confronts false narratives — interpretations of reality that distort who God is and what is true.

This is where the psalm becomes uncomfortably relevant. Not every voice in me tells the truth. Not every thought deserves the authority I give it. The psalm exposes the instability of my own internal dialogue.

Addressing Himself: Reorientation, Not Catharsis

Then comes a turn inward:
“Be angry, and do not sin; ponder in your own hearts… be silent.”
“Offer right sacrifices and put your trust in the LORD.”

Here David speaks to his own soul. Not to console it. Not to indulge it. But to reorient it.

This is not self-soothing.
This is not emotional ventilation.
This is moral and spiritual recalibration.

The psalm assumes that the self does not naturally drift toward truth. It must be guided, corrected, disciplined. Again, this challenges me: I have treated the psalms as emotional outlets, as ways to “process” what I feel. But Psalm 4 does not simply express the inner world — it reshapes it.

Returning to God: Rest Rooted in Reality

The psalm ends with a return to God:
“You have put more joy in my heart…”
“In peace I will both lie down and sleep…”

This sounds serene, but it is not cheap serenity. Nothing in David’s circumstances has changed. What has changed is his posture.

Not:
“I feel peaceful, therefore I trust.”
But:
“I trust, therefore I can sleep.”

That distinction is crucial.

I used to think the psalms were meant to capture emotion so that emotion could then guide thinking and behaviour. But that is a modern reading. The psalms were written not to validate my inner world but to train it — to teach me how to live truthfully before God even when my emotions lag behind.

The psalms do not say, “Feel this.”
They say, “Remember this.”
And in remembering, be formed.

So What Is Psalm 4 Doing in Me?

If the psalm’s aim were comfort, I would still be waiting. I do not feel particularly comforted. I do not feel dramatically changed.

But I can tell I am being formed — slowly, quietly — toward a way of trusting God that does not depend on clarity or emotional reassurance.

The psalm gives me a rhythm:
petition → correction → inward discipline → trust → rest.

It unsettles me before it steadies me.
It challenges me before it soothes me.
It trains me before it speaks peace over me.

And perhaps that is how it is meant to work.

Reflection Question

Where do you sense God inviting you to be formed rather than soothed — and how might that reshape the way you pray?

Share

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

The beginning of a new year carries its own quiet demands.

Even before anything has changed, there is an expectation to know where we are headed: to name a direction, a plan, a vision for the months ahead. The calendar turns, and with it comes a subtle pressure to organise our hopes, to give shape to what we want this year to be for.

But not all seasons cooperate with that kind of clarity.

Some questions do not resolve simply because the year has changed. Some longings remain open. Some journeys continue without offering a clear map forward. And in those moments, the insistence on certainty can feel less like wisdom and more like noise.

As this year begins, I find myself not rushing toward answers, but returning to questions I have carried for some time now. Not as a failure to move on, but as an honest place to begin.

Because I keep circling the same questions.

God calls us to follow Him.
God has a will and a purpose for our lives.
We are meant to live faithfully, here and now, until we are finally with Him, awaiting the renewal of all things.

On paper, the story is coherent. On paper, it even sounds hopeful.

But somewhere in the middle, the coherence begins to strain.

If the end is communion with God, why the long road?
Why not bring people into paradise the moment they come to know Him?
Why faith that must be tested, refined, and stretched across years that remain unresolved?

At first, the simplest answer is that God is doing something we cannot see, that His purposes extend beyond our understanding and our timelines.

That may be true.
But it does not quite settle the question.

Because even as we are being transformed now, it is still insufficient.

The Uneasy Realization

No amount of faithfulness completes the work.
No obedience finishes it.
No spiritual discipline carries us all the way.

Scripture does not pretend otherwise. We are not perfected. We see dimly. We groan. We wait. Even the most faithful lives in the biblical story end unfinished.

God Himself must complete what He has begun.

And when that finally lands, it exposes something difficult to hold.

It means that this life — this long obedience, this waiting, this half-formed hope — is not about reaching completion. It is not about becoming spiritually adequate. It is not even about arriving at clarity.

It is about participation.

Participation, Not as Metaphor but as Reality

Participation is easy to misunderstand.

It can sound like contribution — doing our part.
Or involvement — being active in God’s work.
Or effort — showing up faithfully until the end.

But Christian participation is something deeper and more demanding.

It is not about what we add.
It is about the life we are drawn into.

The claim of Christian faith is not that we slowly become complete on our own, but that our lives are joined — hidden within a life that is not originally ours. Our story is being woven into something larger, something whose meaning does not depend on our ability to make it add up.

Participation means that even now — unfinished, unresolved, insufficient — we are living within the life of God.

Not as spectators.
Not as performers.
But as creatures learning how to remain.

Not a Test, Not a Holding Pattern

This reframes everything.

Life is not a test we must pass so that God can finally take us home.
It is not probation.
It is not leverage.

If it were, the delay would feel cruel.

Participation suggests something else entirely.

This life is not about proving that we are worthy of the end. It is about learning how to live in communion before everything is resolved.

Remaining faithful without clarity.
Remaining prayerful when prayers go unanswered.
Remaining open-handed when outcomes refuse to settle.

Participation does not eliminate longing.
It dignifies it.

It does not rush resolution.
It sustains presence.

Why Transformation Is Real and Still Insufficient

This is why transformation in this life is real but incomplete.

We are not being filled up with holiness until we reach a threshold. We are learning how to live in relationship with God, with others, with our own limits as finite creatures.

That learning cannot be completed within time.

There are wounds that cannot be healed here.
Longings that will not be fulfilled here.
Questions that will remain unanswered here.

And yet, what happens now is not wasted.

The person God will one day complete is not an abstract redeemed self. It is this person shaped by waiting and grief, obedience and desire, faith and fragility. The incompleteness does not disqualify the life. It gives it continuity.

God does not discard the unfinished.
He completes it.

The Deeper Tension

Still, this is not comforting in an easy way.

What presses most sharply is not that God must finish the work,
but that I cannot.

That I must live dependent — trusting a future I cannot secure. That meaning is not something I manufacture, but something I receive. That faith is not about control, progress, or visible coherence.

Participation removes the illusion of mastery.

It asks me to stay rather than to succeed.
To be faithful rather than effective.
To consent to being held rather than to insist on being finished.

And that is a costly invitation.

Hope, Reimagined

Perhaps this is what hope actually looks like.

Not confidence in progress.
Not assurance that things will resolve neatly.
Not certainty that the story will soon make sense.

But trust that the God who has joined my life to His own will not abandon what He has begun.

Even when the middle stretches longer than expected.
Even when the transformation feels slow and insufficient.
Even when the ending remains out of reach.

Even here.
Especially here.

A Question to Carry

As this year begins, what might it look like to live this season? Not as delay or failure, but as participation: a life held by God even before it is complete?

Share

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

I have been delaying my end-of-the-year reflection.
Not because nothing happened, but because too much did.

The past year carried both endings and beginnings, often arriving together and refusing to be neatly separated. Some changes were chosen, others arrived uninvited. There were moments of gratitude, moments of grief, and many conversations (some hopeful, some tearful) about what it means to move forward when the path ahead is still unclear.

And yet, even here, there are many reasons to be thankful.

Last Sunday, Psalm 116 was mentioned during the service. I returned to it later, and the opening verses met me more gently than I expected:

I love the Lord, because he heard my voice;
he heard my cry for mercy.
Because he turned his ear to me,
I will call on him as long as I live.

The psalmist begins not with abstraction, but relationship.
“I love the Lord,” and then he tells us why.

Not because life is easy, but because God hears.
Because God listens.
Because God does not turn away from cries for mercy.

That, I recognize. To be heard. To be attended to. To cry out and not be dismissed. There is a quiet joy in knowing that our prayers do not disappear into silence.

As the psalm continues, it becomes clear that this is a testimony spoken after distress. The psalmist looks back on a season of fear and anxiety, on a time when death felt close, and remembers that he called on God anyway. He did not sanitize his emotions, edit his thoughts, or refine his prayers. He spoke honestly, and God responded. God protected him. God saved him.

Gratitude, in this psalm, is not theoretical. It is rooted in memory, in having lived through something that could have ended differently.

But then the psalm turns in a way that unsettles me:

Precious in the sight of the Lord
is the death of his faithful ones.

I stumbled here.

What does this mean?

Is the psalmist saying that God grieves when his people die? But how does that fit with the hope of being with God beyond death? Is this verse speaking to those left behind? The ones who mourn? Or is the psalmist speaking about himself, reflecting on how close he came to dying?

This is, after all, a deeply personal psalm.

Perhaps the psalmist is holding something more layered than a simple answer.

He is grateful that God saved him from death.
But he is also confessing that even if God had not, his life — and even his death — would still have mattered deeply to God.

The word translated precious does not mean pleasant or desirable. It carries the sense of something costly, weighty, not taken lightly. In other words, the death of God’s faithful ones is not insignificant. It is not cheap. It does not pass unnoticed.

That realization does not weaken the psalm. It strengthens it.

The psalmist’s gratitude is not naïve. It is not built on the assumption that God always intervenes in the way we hope. It is shaped by the recognition that God’s faithfulness is not hostage to outcomes.

His praise is not built on the fragile logic that says, God is good because I survived.
It rests on something sturdier: God is good because I am seen, heard, and held — whether in life or in death.

And so the psalmist vows to keep walking in God’s presence.
To keep calling on the Lord’s name.
To keep living a life of gratitude, not because everything turned out well, but because God remained attentive throughout.

That feels important to name as this year comes to a close.

Some prayers are still unanswered.
Some doors have not opened.
Some questions remain unresolved.

And yet, God hears.
God listens.
God saves, sometimes in ways we recognize, sometimes in ways we only understand later.
God protects.
God is merciful.
God cares.

Gratitude does not cancel the questions.
But neither do the questions cancel gratitude.

Gratitude does not require resolution.
It requires memory, honesty, and the courage to keep calling on a God who listens.

So I repeat this to myself, not as denial, but as confession:

There are still so many reasons to be thankful.
Even here.

A Closing Prayer

God who listens,
You hear our voices and our cries for mercy.
You see the endings we did not choose
and the beginnings we step into with uncertainty.

Teach us to remember where You have been near,
and give us the courage to keep calling on You
even when prayers remain unanswered.

Hold us in gratitude that does not deny grief,
and in hope that does not demand resolution.
Help us walk in Your presence,
knowing that we are seen, heard, and held —
even here.

Amen.

Share

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

Advent means arrival.
And yet, every year, Advent begins not with arrival, but with waiting.

This is not accidental. Christianity does not rush to resolution. It trains its people to live in the in-between: between promise and fulfilment, longing and gift, prayer and silence.

I have spent a long time in that space.
Not a brief pause. Not a season with a clear arc. But a prolonged middle where nothing visibly resolves, and the passing of time itself begins to feel like a threat.

For a while, I assumed this meant my faith was faltering. If waiting felt unbearable, surely something was wrong with my hope, my trust, or my posture before God.

Only recently have I begun to see the distinction more clearly:
sometimes it is not hope or trust that is under strain.
Sometimes it is waiting itself.

Waiting Is Not Neutral

In Christian imagination, waiting is often spoken of gently, even reverently. But biblically, waiting is not calm by default. The Hebrew word qāwâ carries the image of tension — like a cord pulled tight. Waiting stretches. It strains. It holds competing forces together.

Scripture does not treat prolonged waiting as a mild inconvenience.
It recognises it as destabilising.

“Hope deferred makes the heart sick” (Proverbs 13:12).

Not hope denied. Deferred.

Advent names this honestly. Israel waited not for days or months, but for centuries — living faithfully without knowing when, how, or even if deliverance would come in their lifetime.

Waiting, in Scripture, is not softened by holiness.
It is sharpened by time.

Advent: Waiting for an Arrival You Cannot Produce

Advent reminds us of something uncomfortable:
God’s arrival cannot be scheduled, managed, or accelerated.

The Messiah does not come because Israel waited well enough.
He comes because God is faithful to God’s promise.

This matters because it reframes waiting. We are not waiting as a technique to trigger divine action. We are waiting because arrival belongs to God, not to us.

This is where the distinction between “waiting for an outcome” and “waiting for God” becomes more than wordplay.

Waiting for an outcome places the weight of meaning on arrival.
Waiting for God places the weight of meaning on presence — even before arrival.

Both acknowledge divine agency.
Only one allows faithfulness to continue without guarantees.

Advent does not ask us to pretend we do not care about the outcome. It asks us to learn how to live before it arrives.

When Waiting Itself Is Under Threat

There are seasons when hope wavers or trust feels thin. But there is another, quieter struggle: when the ability to keep waiting begins to erode.

This happens when:

• there is no clear horizon,

• no way to interpret time as progress,

• and no assurance that endurance will be rewarded.

The nervous system experiences time not as neutral delay, but as pressure.

This is why waiting can feel like a roller-coaster that does not end. The ups and downs are familiar; the lack of an exit is what exhausts.

Advent does not deny this exhaustion. It dignifies it.

Israel’s waiting was not marked by uninterrupted confidence. It was marked by lament, doubt, protest, and hope that refused to die — even when deferred.

Lament: The Language of Advent Waiting

Advent is not quiet optimism. It is ache held open.

Lament belongs here because lament is what keeps waiting from becoming corrosive.

Lament does three things at once:

1. It names time as painful, not merely inconvenient.

2. It refuses false closure.

3. It keeps the relationship with God open.

This is why lament repeats itself. Repetition is not regression; it is maintenance.

Many psalms of lament end without resolution because the situation itself had not resolved. Scripture preserves these prayers because unresolved waiting is not a failure of faith, it is one of its most honest expressions.

To lament again is not to move backward.
It is to remain engaged.

When Lament Sustains and When It Harms

Not all repetition is life-giving. Lament sustains when it remains addressed— spoken to God, even when God feels silent.

Lament becomes harmful when it collapses into closed loops: when prayer becomes rumination, when language hardens into absolutes, when speech no longer expects to be heard.

The diagnostic question is simple, but searching:

After lamenting, am I more open or more defended?

Advent does not rush us past this discernment. It teaches us to wait truthfully, not stoically.

God’s Arrival Does Not Always End the Waiting

Here is the Advent paradox:
God arrives — and waiting does not end (at least not yet).

Christ comes, and yet we still wait.
For healing. For restoration. For the world to be set right.

Advent reminds us that God’s action is not limited to resolution. Sometimes God acts by entering the waiting itself.

Jesus is not born into a solved world.
He is born into Roman occupation, fragile bodies, deferred hopes, and ordinary faithfulness.

“My soul is overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of death.”

This is not doubt in the Father’s goodness.
It is obedience that remains costly — carried out in sorrow, without immediate deliverance.

Faithfulness in the In-Between

So what does faithfulness look like when waiting itself is fraying?

Not heroic endurance. Not spiritual performance.

Often, it looks small.

It looks like:

• shortening the horizon to today,

• legitimizing exhaustion without moralizing it,

• returning to the same prayer without trying to improve it.

Sometimes faithfulness sounds like this:

“Lord, I am still here, but staying is costing me more than before.”

Advent does not require more than that.
It requires presence.

Even Here

Advent teaches us to wait not because waiting is good, but because God comes.

And until God arrives as we long for Him to,
we wait with Him.

Even here.

Share

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

For a movement so attuned to the Spirit’s immediacy, Pentecostalism can struggle to hold space for what remains unresolved. Our songs know the sound of triumph — but not always of tears.

The Pentecostal Imagination: Where Power Is Present

In most Pentecostal settings, the spiritual world is not a metaphor but a daily reality. Demons, blessings, angels, and curses shape how we understand health, relationships, and destiny. When life unravels, we instinctively ask what spiritual cause lies beneath the surface.

There’s beauty in this posture. It reflects a vivid awareness of God’s nearness and the conviction that no part of life is beyond His reach. But it can also become exhausting — because not all pain can be prayed away.

A worldview that sees every hardship as a spiritual problem leaves little room for the mystery of grace that doesn’t always fix what hurts. It leaves us uncertain what to do when the miracle delays, or doesn’t arrive at all.

The Missing Language of Lament

Other Christian traditions have kept the language of lament alive — the space to cry out, “How long, O Lord?” without rushing to a resolution. In the Psalms, lament is not faithlessness; it’s fidelity in its most honest form.

Pentecostals, however, often read tears as defeat. We prefer testimonies of victory to stories of waiting. Yet the Spirit who gives us tongues of fire is also the Spirit who groans with us (Romans 8:26). Those groans are not signs of unbelief — they are prayer in its purest form, when words fail and the heart still reaches toward God.

If our theology of power does not include the Spirit’s capacity to weep, then we have reduced the Spirit to an instrument of control rather than communion.

Generational Curses and the Problem of Explanation

The conversation about generational curses reveals this tension. Many Pentecostal believers sincerely seek to break unseen chains — patterns of addiction, illness, or conflict that seem to repeat in families. There’s pastoral empathy here; it’s an attempt to make sense of suffering that feels inherited.

Yet Scripture resists our need for simple causality.
In Exodus 20:5–6, God warns that sin affects generations — but immediately extends His mercy “to a thousand generations of those who love Him.”
In John 9:3, Jesus rejects the disciples’ assumption that the man’s blindness must be someone’s fault: “Neither this man nor his parents sinned.”
And in Galatians 3:13, Paul proclaims that Christ “became a curse for us,” transforming judgment into blessing.

The cross does not deny that sin has generational consequences. It proclaims that mercy has generational reach.
Grace, too, can be inherited.

When we fixate on tracing curses, we risk turning grace into a diagnostic tool and redemption into a formula. The deeper truth is that some suffering will never make sense this side of resurrection — and that’s precisely where faith lives.

The Cross and the Spirit: Power in Weakness

Pentecostals love the resurrection story — and rightly so. But resurrection power is cruciform power. The risen Christ still bears wounds.

A mature Pentecostal theology would not separate the Spirit’s fire from the Spirit’s tears. The same Spirit who raised Jesus from the dead also sustained Him through Gethsemane.
The Spirit’s presence does not always remove the thorn; sometimes it transfigures it (2 Corinthians 12:7–10).

That kind of power doesn’t silence lament; it sanctifies it. It allows us to say, “The curse stops here,” not because we have mastered spiritual technique, but because Christ’s grace is sufficient — even when the pain lingers.

Toward a Theology of Groaning

If Pentecostal communities could recover the language of lament, several things might follow:

• Deliverance would include dignity. Instead of reducing people to spiritual problems, we would honor their suffering as sacred space where God is still at work.

• Healing would be redefined. It would mean wholeness, not just the absence of pain.

• Faith would be freed from performance. Tears would no longer be shameful but faithful — evidence that the Spirit intercedes even when our words collapse.

• Generational blessing would be seen not as reward for spiritual perfection, but as the slow work of grace rewriting our stories through time.

When the Spirit Groans

Perhaps this is where Pentecostal faith must go next — not away from power, but toward cruciform power; not away from deliverance, but toward redemptive solidarity.

Maybe the Spirit’s greatest deliverance is not from suffering, but from the need to make suffering make sense.
Maybe the truest blessing we can pass on is not the end of pain, but the assurance that the Spirit never leaves us in it.

“The Spirit Himself intercedes for us with groans too deep for words.” Romans 8:26

Even here — in the groaning, in the waiting, in the places where the victory has not yet appeared — the Spirit abides.

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

Even among Christians, the language of generational curses and spiritual warfare remains deeply familiar.
We pray for deliverance, plead the blood of Jesus, and ask that every curse be broken.
But beneath these prayers often lies a quieter question:

If Christ has already won,
why does evil still seem to have a hold?

The Unseen World the Bible Acknowledges

Scripture never flattens reality into materialism. It affirms that evil is personal and active.

“Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, the authorities, the powers of this dark world and the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.” (Ephesians 6:12)

This means our fears are not naïve. The Bible agrees that life is contested.
But it also insists that the contest is not equal.

“He disarmed the powers and authorities and made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.” (Colossians 2:15)

Evil still acts, but only as a trespasser. The decisive victory has already been won.

The Powers Behind the Patterns

So what about the things that seem to run in families?
Can spirits or curses be passed down through generations?

The Bible does not describe demons inheriting bloodlines.
It does, however, show how sin’s patterns — deceit, idolatry, violence, fear — can open doors to spiritual bondage.
When we persist in unrepented sin, we invite oppression; when we walk in truth, we close those doors.

The Apostle Paul warns,

“Do not give the devil a foothold.” (Ephesians 4:27)

That foothold isn’t ancestry. It’s allegiance.
And allegiance can be broken through repentance, forgiveness, and obedience to Christ.

Possession, Oppression, and Presence

In the Gospels, Jesus delivers many who were demon-possessed.
But after Pentecost, believers — those filled with the Spirit — are never described as possessed.

Oppressed, yes.
Tempted, deceived, tormented — yes.
But not inhabited or owned.

“You are not your own; you were bought at a price.” (1 Corinthians 6:19–20)

The difference matters.
Possession means control. Oppression means resistance.
And the Holy Spirit is not a tenant who shares the house.

So when Christians fear that an ancestor’s spirit still lingers, the gospel answers clearly: You already belong to someone else.

“The One who is in you is greater than the one who is in the world.” (1 John 4:4)

Spiritual Warfare Without Fear

Too often, spiritual warfare has been framed as a dramatic battle between near-equal forces, as if we must continually fight to retain ground.
But the New Testament pictures something quieter and stronger: standing firm in a finished victory.

Paul’s armour of God (Ephesians 6:10–18) isn’t about rituals or incantations; it’s about formation:

• Truth against deception,

• Righteousness against accusation,

• Faith against fear,

• Salvation against despair,

• The Word against confusion,

• Prayer against isolation.

Warfare is not won by shouting louder, but by living truer.
The holiest life is the greatest resistance.

Every act of forgiveness, every refusal to lie, every prayer of surrender. Each is an act of war against the darkness that wants to repeat itself.

When Deliverance Is Needed

Still, there are moments when evil’s grip feels heavy.
Deliverance ministry, when grounded in Scripture and humility, can serve as a form of pastoral care. Not spectacle, but healing.

The goal is never dependence on a ritual, but renewal of allegiance to Christ.
True deliverance leads to discipleship. It doesn’t end with a shout; it continues with a life of holiness.

“Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.” (James 4:7)

Deliverance without discipleship is like eviction without renovation and the house remains vulnerable.
But when truth fills the rooms of the heart, there is no place left for fear to live.

A Different Kind of Battle

Spiritual warfare, then, is not a war to win but a reality to live faithfully within.
We are not fighting for victory; we are fighting from it.

Christ’s triumph means that believers are not victims of spiritual inheritance but participants in spiritual renewal.
Our battle is to remember, and to resist the lie that evil runs in our veins stronger than grace.

So if your family’s story feels haunted by the past, hear this:

A Prayer for Courage and Clarity

Lord Jesus Christ,
You have conquered the powers that terrify us.
When evil feels near, remind us it is already defeated.
Teach us to stand firm. Not in fear, but in faith.
Close every door that sin has opened,
and fill every room of our hearts with Your light.
May our families be known not for what bound us,
but for the grace that broke every chain.
Amen.

Even Here

Evil is real, but it does not write the ending.
Grace is the truer inheritance,
and every act of faithfulness is another crack of light
in what once felt like unending darkness.

We are not fighting to break a curse.
We are learning to live free.

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

There are some questions we only ask when life doesn’t turn out as neatly as we’d hoped.
When patterns seem to repeat — loss, conflict, infertility, disappointment — we start to wonder if something deeper is at work. In many Asian families, where the spiritual world is as real as the physical one, it feels natural to interpret these experiences through that lens.

Even among Christians, we often speak of generational blessings and curses, of families that seem “blessed” and others that appear to carry unseen burdens. We wonder if we are living under something we did not choose, something passed down long before we were born.

It’s an honest question. And it deserves an equally honest answer.

What the Bible Really Says

Scripture never downplays the reach of sin. God’s warning in Exodus 20:5–6 that He “visits the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generation” reminds us that what one generation does can affect those who follow. Brokenness is rarely contained.

But that same passage tells us something greater: God’s steadfast love extends “to a thousand generations” of those who love Him. Mercy, not judgment, is His defining posture.

By the time of Ezekiel 18, God makes this point unmistakably clear:

“The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father.”

Sin has consequences, yes. But guilt is not inherited. God deals with each person justly and mercifully. The story of Scripture moves away from fatalism and toward freedom, from determinism to grace.

Christ and the End of the Curse

Then comes the cross, the hinge of all history.

“Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us.” (Galatians 3:13)

Whatever form the curse once took: covenant judgment, alienation, spiritual bondage — it ended at Calvary. The New Testament reframes blessing and curse entirely around Jesus.

To be in Christ is to belong to a new family line, adopted as sons and daughters of God (Romans 8:15). Blessing is no longer measured in prosperity or fertility, but in participation in God’s life.

Why Family Patterns Still Persist

Even so, patterns can linger: anger, fear, secrecy, addiction, control.
But these are not mystical curses that still need to be broken. They are habits and wounds the Holy Spirit is healing over time.

When we pray to “break curses,” what we’re often really doing is repenting, forgiving, and inviting grace into painful histories. Those prayers matter, not because they shatter some hidden spell, but because they bring what is broken into the light of Christ.

The cross has already broken the curse.
Now the Spirit is teaching us to live as free people.

A Word to Those Who Fear Their Family Story

If you come from a line that feels marked by sorrow or loss, remember this: you are not bound to repeat it.

Each time you forgive what others could not, each time you choose honesty instead of silence, each time you bless instead of resent — you are already living the miracle of a new inheritance. The curse is not only broken; it is being replaced with blessing.

From Fear to Freedom

The real question is not whether generational curses exist.
The real question is: Where do we place the final authority?

In our family’s past? Or in Christ’s victory?

To walk in freedom is not to forget your story, but to let grace be the one telling it now.

A Pastoral Prayer

Lord Jesus Christ,
You bore our curse and turned it into blessing.
Where our families have been marked by pain,
let Your mercy have the final word.
Teach us to walk as sons and daughters of grace,
not in fear of what we’ve inherited,
but in gratitude for what You’ve already redeemed.
May forgiveness, truth, and peace
flow through our families for generations to come.
Amen.

We sometimes inherit stories we didn’t choose.
But in Christ, grace becomes the new inheritance.

Sin may reach the third and fourth generation — but mercy reaches a thousand.
That’s the family story we live in now.
Even here.

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

“Meaningless! Meaningless!” says the Teacher. “Utterly meaningless! Everything is meaningless.”
— Ecclesiastes 1:2

Some time ago, during seminary, I wrote a paper on Ecclesiastes. The assignment was to explore “the meaning of life” in the book, but it quickly became more than academic. I wrestled deeply as I wrote, because the questions of the Teacher felt uncomfortably close to my own. It was personal, emotional, and unsettling.

Now, in this season of waiting and in-between, I find myself returning to that paper. I want to see what wisdom Ecclesiastes might hold for me again, and maybe for you as well. Over the next three reflections, I’ll revisit the book’s honesty about life’s fleeting nature, its contradictions, and finally, its quiet invitation to fear God and receive life as a gift.

Some mornings, I watch the steam rise from my cup of coffee. For a moment, it curls upward, almost beautiful. Then, just as quickly, it vanishes.

That’s the image Ecclesiastes gives us: hebel. A word often translated as “meaningless,” but closer to “breath” or “vapor.” Something fleeting, elusive, impossible to hold. The Teacher, Qoheleth, looks at the world and says, “This is what life feels like.”

And if I’m honest, I know what he means. Maybe you do too.

Chasing After Wind

I kept telling myself, once I finish training, start practicing, get married, have kids, then I’ll feel settled. But the relief never stayed and some of the longings not fulfilled. As soon as I arrived, I found myself already looking toward the next thing.

Qoheleth tried the same experiment on a grander scale. He chased everything he could think of. He chased wisdom, pleasure, wealth, and work. “I denied myself nothing my eyes desired” (Eccl. 2:10). And yet his verdict was blunt: “everything was meaningless, a chasing after the wind” (2:11).

Have you ever chased something, only to discover it wasn’t what you hoped?

Saying It Out Loud

Most of us don’t like to admit this. We’d rather cling to verses that promise joy and strength, not verses that sound like despair. Ecclesiastes unsettles us because it names what we often bury: much of what we run after leaves us hollow.

But maybe that’s why Ecclesiastes itself is a gift. It doesn’t sugarcoat life. It tells the truth, even when it’s hard to hear. And in doing so, it gives us permission to tell the truth about our own lives too.

If you’ve ever whispered, “Is this all there is?”, Ecclesiastes nods back. You’re not alone.

The Invitation Inside the Ache

Still, the Teacher doesn’t write only to leave us in emptiness. Hidden inside his lament is an invitation: if everything “under the sun” feels like vapor, maybe it’s time to look beyond it.

Pleasure, wealth, work, even wisdom are not evil. But they can’t bear the weight of being ultimate. They can’t give us the meaning we hunger for.

Qoheleth hints at another way: life not as something to grasp, but as something to receive. Joy not as something to manufacture, but as a gift. Reverence for God as the anchor that keeps us steady when everything else proves slippery.

But before he leads us there, he asks us to sit honestly with the vapor. To admit what we’d rather deny: that life often feels like hebel, like breath that disappears in the morning air.

And maybe that’s where true meaning begins. Not in pretending everything makes sense, but in confessing how often it doesn’t.

Reflection Question

What are you wrestling with right now that feels like vapor in your hands?

In the next reflection, we’ll look at how Ecclesiastes faces life’s contradictions: the seasons we cannot control, the injustices that wound, and the reality of death.

Leave a comment

From time to time, I meet believers who, over the span of decades, have found themselves in many different churches: Catholic, evangelical, Pentecostal, mainline Protestant, even fringe movements they later realized were unhealthy. Each congregation added another chapter to their spiritual story. In memory, they can still picture the places of worship and fellowship: the cool stone of a cathedral, a Bible study held on the grass under the trees, the haze of lights and smoke machines in a youth service. At times they were embraced, at times unsettled, sometimes running toward something, sometimes walking away.

The Filipino Christian Landscape

In the Philippines, moving between churches is not unusual especially for those who leave their home province for the city. The move might be for university in Manila, a job in Cebu, or training in Davao. Suddenly, the religious landscape changes. In place of the familiar neighbourhood parish or the small Pentecostal fellowship down the street, the city offers cathedrals, air-conditioned megachurches, storefront congregations, campus ministries, and even fringe groups handing out flyers in jeepney terminals.

Some changes happen because of work schedules, marriage into another tradition, or a friend’s invitation to “just visit” their church. Others are prompted by a season of disillusionment that sparks a search for something that feels more true. Over time, the pews (and sometimes the plastic chairs) you’ve sat in form a kind of spiritual map, telling as much about your journey as it does about the diversity of the Philippine church.

The Critical Turn

Over time, that much movement can sharpen a believer’s instincts. You learn to compare sermons with Scripture, to spot patterns in leadership, to recognize when a church’s energy outpaces its depth. But it can also make you wary. It makes you quick to note flaws, slow to commit, or suspicious of passion that isn’t backed by integrity. In a culture where honoring authority and keeping peace are valued, such wariness can be misunderstood as arrogance or cynicism.

Sometimes I wonder, could it be that all this movement is less about deep theological conviction and more about searching for the “right” denomination? The one that finally feels like home, that preaches with both power and precision, that gets every doctrine right. If so, then moving from church to church can start to feel like changing clothes: a fresh look for a season, until something frays or no longer fits. But then, isn’t every church, no matter how faithful, still made up of flawed people? From where I stand, I don’t believe there is a single “right” denomination. Every tradition has its blind spots and its beauty. And yet, beneath the restlessness, there might be something more. A hunger for a faith that truly holds together, not just in creed but in life.

The Longing Beneath the Critique

Maybe this is what drives many restless believers. Not novelty for its own sake, but a longing for a faith that is both reasonable and livable. A gospel that speaks truth on Sundays and still makes sense on Mondays. For some, it’s the desire to worship where Scripture is handled with both reverence and relevance. For others, it’s the hope for a community that lives what it proclaims, where the fruit matches the confession.

The Relational Cost

Believers like this can be magnetic to the disillusioned, giving them language for their unease. But they can also be isolating to those who feel their community is under constant scrutiny. Churches may quietly label them as “hard to please.” Friends may keep conversations light to avoid theological sparring.

And sometimes, I have to admit, I’ve wondered if I, too, have been quietly filed away in that category, ignored rather than engaged, considered more subversive than sincere.

Holding the Tension

And yet, God meets people in this searching. Even those who feel too skeptical to belong fully, yet too believing to walk away. The body of Christ needs both the steady and the restless, the ones who preserve and the ones who provoke. For the seeker: keep looking, but guard against burning every bridge. For the community: listen without assuming hostility, and remember that the questioner may be asking from a place of longing, not rebellion.

“Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will grow to become in every respect the mature body of him who is the head, that is, Christ.” (Ephesians 4:15)

Leave a comment

I have been sitting with Psalm 77, not because I understand it, but because I need it.

Asaph begins not with composure but with desperation:
“I cry aloud to God… and He will hear me.”

That line alone holds more weight than it seems. It’s not a confident proclamation. It’s a stubborn, maybe even trembling, hope. A prayer uttered in the dark.

He doesn’t receive comfort when he seeks it. He can’t sleep. He can’t speak. Even prayer feels impossible. His memory torments him. He recalls the songs of the night, the joy he once had in God’s presence. But now, those memories feel like salt in the wound. They raise questions that pierce:

• Has God rejected me?

• Will He ever be kind to me again?

• Has His love run out?

• Have His promises failed?

• Has He forgotten how to be gracious?

I’ve asked these too, though not always aloud. Sometimes I wonder if I still believe what I once knew to be true. Sometimes I fear that I do. And that it’s still not enough to move God’s hand.

Asaph doesn’t get a direct answer to his questions. What he gets is a shift. A change in posture.
He turns from inward anguish to outward remembrance:
“I will remember the deeds of the Lord… your miracles of long ago.”

He doesn’t remember because it solves his pain. He remembers because it grounds him in a God who has moved before. A God who parted the sea. Who led His people through waters no one else knew were crossable.

“Your path led through the sea, your way through the mighty waters, though your footprints were not seen.”

That line haunts me in the best kind of way.
It doesn’t promise immediate rescue. It doesn’t deny the chaos.
It simply insists: even when the way is invisible, God makes a way.
Even when His footprints disappear, His presence does not.

And yet, what if He doesn’t intervene?
What if the waters don’t part this time?
Where does that leave me?

This is where the psalm falls quiet. It doesn’t give answers. But it does something more honest: it keeps me with God. Even in the questioning. Even in the ache.

“You led your people like a flock.”
He didn’t just part the sea. He stayed. He guided. He walked with them on the other side.

So maybe the psalm isn’t meant to fix my fear. Maybe it’s meant to accompany me in it.
To remind me that dissonance is part of faith.
That the silence of God does not always signal His absence.
That even when my prayers echo back unanswered, I am still heard.

Here’s the prayer I find myself whispering as I read this psalm:

Lord, I fear the answer. But I have no one else.
You are all I have.
Help me love You still, even when You say no.
Even when I can’t see the way through.
Help me remember that You make paths in places no one else sees.
And You lead even when I cannot trace Your steps.

Maybe that’s what it means to keep hoping. Not that I stop hurting, but that I keep turning, again and again, to the only One who can still lead me forward.

Even here.

Leave a comment

There may come a time — perhaps you’re in it now — when prayer feels more like protest than peace.
When faith no longer feels triumphant, but tenuous.
When you keep showing up before God not because you’re full of hope, but because you have nowhere else to go.

You’ve prayed.
You’ve waited.
You’ve believed.
And still, heaven remains quiet. The silence thickens. The waiting stretches. And you begin to wonder if God is still listening. Or if He was ever speaking at all.

You don’t want to walk away. But you also don’t know how to keep walking forward. You’re exhausted, confused, maybe even angry.

And perhaps worst of all, you feel like you’re not allowed to feel this way.

The Hidden Grief of the Faithful

Somewhere along the way, many of us were taught that real faith looks like unwavering trust.
That if we doubt, or despair, or rage in God’s direction, we’re somehow failing Him.

So we edit our prayers.
We tidy up our tears.
We end our complaints with “But Your will be done,” even when our hearts don’t feel it.
We hold our breath in God’s presence, trying to be on our best behavior.

But the Bible tells a different story.

The Lament Without a Turn

Psalm 88 is one of the most jarring prayers in Scripture. It doesn’t end with praise. It doesn’t resolve into hope. It doesn’t even sound like it believes God will answer.

It begins like this:

“Lord, you are the God who saves me;
day and night I cry out to you.” (v. 1)

But soon, the language shifts — downward. The psalmist speaks of being overwhelmed, abandoned, close to death. Friends have turned away. God, it seems, has too.

And then it ends:

“You have taken from me friend and neighbor —
darkness is my closest friend.” (v. 18)

No resolution. No rescue. No “yet I will praise You.” Just… silence. Darkness. Grief.

And still, this psalm was kept in Israel’s liturgy. Preserved in the canon. Held as Scripture.

That tells us something: God does not require your prayers to resolve.

Lament Is Not Unfaithfulness

Some psalms do turn. Psalm 13, for example, begins with:

“How long, O Lord? Will you forget me forever?”

and ends with:

“But I trust in your unfailing love…”

That kind of prayer has a rightful place in the life of faith.
But so does the kind that never turns.
So does the cry that ends with no answer.

It is not less faithful to stay in the tension.
It is not rebellion to express pain without a polished resolution.

Sometimes the greatest act of faith is simply staying, refusing to let go of God even when everything in you wants to walk away.

What If You Prayed Like That?

What if your prayer didn’t need to end in praise today?
What if God could receive your protest without correction?
What if He already has? In the voices of the psalmists, the prophets, even His own Son?

Jesus Himself cried out on the cross:

“My God, my God, why have You forsaken me?” (Matt. 27:46)

It is the opening line of Psalm 22 — a psalm that begins in desolation and only later moves toward trust. But Jesus doesn’t quote the ending — only the anguish. He enters fully into the darkness of unanswered prayer.

If Jesus could cry out like that, maybe you can, too.

Maybe faith doesn’t mean always feeling close to God.
Maybe it means choosing to stay. Even when God feels absent.

When Your Words Run Out

If all you can say today is:

“God, I’m tired.
I’ve waited long enough.
I’m angry, and I don’t want to pretend anymore…”

then say that.

You don’t have to wrap it in a verse or soften it with a theological disclaimer.
You don’t have to conclude with confidence or gratitude.
You can let the prayer sit unfinished. Raw. Unresolved.

And still, it is heard.
Still, it is held.

This, Too, Is Worship

The God who inspired Psalm 88 is not afraid of your pain.
He doesn’t flinch at your questions.
He doesn’t require you to perform hope when you can’t feel it.

Lament is not a detour from the life of faith.
It is the life of faith — for those who remain, even when the light goes out.

So if your prayer today ends not with joy but with silence, know this:
God is still there.
And so are you.
And somehow, that is still communion.

Reflection Question

What would your unedited prayer sound like today?

Leave a comment

I was reading a commentary on the Gospel of Matthew when I paused over a striking rebuke from John the Baptist. Seeing the Pharisees and Sadducees approach his baptism, he turned on them with unflinching words:

“You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath? Produce fruit in keeping with repentance. And do not think you can say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham.”
(Matthew 3:7–9)

John’s warning was clear: religious heritage does not exempt anyone from the call to genuine repentance. Being a physical descendant of Abraham, part of the covenant people, wasn’t enough. God could raise up children for Abraham from stones, he said. It was a startling image. The kingdom of heaven wasn’t inherited like a family heirloom; it had to be entered personally.

Of course, John wasn’t rejecting God’s covenant with Israel or denying the value of generational faith. His rebuke was directed at religious leaders who presumed that lineage alone guaranteed right standing with God. The deeper truth is this: whether we grow up in faith or come to it later, what matters is a living, responsive relationship with God, not mere proximity to religious identity.

That’s when I remembered a phrase I’d heard before:
“God has no grandchildren.”

It made me chuckle. I’m a third-generation Christian. My grandfather was a pastor. I was raised in the faith, and my childhood was full of Christian rhythms: Sunday school, memory verses, Vacation Bible School during summers, family devotions. I even remember participating in a school debate about creation versus evolution in sixth grade and defending creation (I cringe now at what I might have said—what does a 12-year-old really know?).

Looking back, I see those years as a gift. They gave me a foundation I didn’t fully understand at the time. I was immersed in Christian life. I knew the songs, the stories, the habits. I probably called myself a Christian because my family was. It was what we did. Church on Sundays. Prayers at meals. Family devotions in the evenings.

But then came my own moment of turning. In my final year of university, after four years in the same church and Bible study group, something finally clicked. I surrendered to the Lordship of Jesus. That’s the moment I mark as my becoming a Christian, not because I hadn’t known about Him before, but because, for the first time, I knew Him. He wasn’t just a name I’d grown up with; He became someone I trusted and followed. Someone I loved.

I’m grateful for that moment. Grateful that my faith didn’t remain borrowed or assumed. That it wasn’t something decided for me, even though I had grown up surrounded by it. I took the step freely. I accepted the invitation of Jesus and gave my life to Him, not out of obligation, but out of recognition.

Some of what I inherited I’ve kept with joy. Some I’ve wrestled with. Some I’ve had to let go. Faith that once felt like culture began to deepen into conviction. And that process, like most real transformations, was slow, honest, sometimes painful, and deeply filled with grace.

But the story doesn’t end there. About twenty years later, I encountered another turning point, this time quieter but no less profound. It wasn’t a dramatic crisis, but a season of questions. The answers I’d once relied on no longer satisfied. The frameworks I had learned, even some I had constructed myself, began to feel too small for the complexity of life, doubt, suffering, and mystery. My faith didn’t collapse, but it did get re-formed. Shaken, humbled, and reshaped.

That season didn’t undo my earlier decision. It deepened it. It moved me from simple faith to deep faith. Not because I became smarter or more certain, but because I became more honest. More rooted in grace than in answers. More lived-in than inherited.

So yes, God has no grandchildren. Each of us is invited to be a child of God. Not because of our lineage, not because of our pedigree or proximity to faith, but because of grace. And what a grace it is to be known, to be loved, to be called daughter.

Leave a comment

Share

And for Wesley, that kind of spiritual formation happened best in small groups.

At the time, I was involved in a discipleship group. I had experienced both the richness and the complexity of those communities. The joy of spiritual friendship and the challenge of spiritual leadership. But now, years later, I find myself in a different season. I’m not part of a small group at the moment. But I long for one. And rereading this chapter recently reminded me why.

Wesley’s Concern: Not Just Converts, but Disciples

Wesley believed that the Church’s task was not simply to bring people to a moment of faith, but to help them grow into the likeness of Christ. Baptism and confession were not endpoints. They were the beginning of a journey marked by obedience, transformation, and holiness.

To that end, Wesley designed small group structures such as class meetings and bands, to provide the kind of regular, disciplined environment where this growth could happen.

These were not passive gatherings. They were communities of accountability and encouragement. Group members asked each other searching questions about their spiritual health. They confessed sin. They encouraged one another. And they did so regularly. It was a rhythm of grace, shaped by a commitment to intentional growth.

I had assumed the rise of small groups was a modern phenomenon, a response to the challenges of large churches or Western individualism. But I was surprised to discover that Wesley’s model was over 300 years old. Its staying power testifies to its spiritual wisdom.

Beyond the Sermon: Why We Need More Than Sunday

Wesley understood that Sunday preaching alone could not sustain a Christian’s growth. As important as the public proclamation of Scripture is, it cannot offer the depth of relationship and personal application that smaller, more intimate settings provide.

Small groups create space for real relationship for being known, challenged, encouraged, and formed. In a small group, you don’t just hear God’s Word; you wrestle with it, live it, and walk it out with others. In a large church, it’s easy to hide. But in a group of five to ten people, anonymity fades. You begin to be seen.

Wesley’s design had a dual purpose: not only to strengthen individual members but also to equip leaders. In walking with others, group leaders were shaped in their own discipleship. And in time, members would be raised up to lead groups themselves creating a multiplying effect of spiritual formation and mission.

Not Just for the New, but for the Nominal

What I found especially compelling in Wesley’s model is that it wasn’t limited to new believers. It also addressed the needs of nominal Christians. Those who had grown passive in their faith but were experiencing spiritual awakening. Discipleship wasn’t a remedial path; it was the Christian life.

This is an important reminder. We often assume that mature Christians no longer need structured accountability or community formation. But spiritual stagnation can affect anyone. Wesley saw small groups not as spiritual training wheels but as essential spaces for ongoing formation for all believers, at every stage.

Discipleship, after all, requires discipline. And in our fragmented, hurried world, it’s hard to cultivate that discipline alone.

A Personal Note: My Experience and My Longing

I’ve been part of several discipleship groups over the years. Some were fruitful; others were less so. I’ve had leaders who were spiritually grounded and others who approached it more like a social event. Some were younger than me, others more seasoned. What became clear to me is that spiritual leadership in a small group is serious work. It requires more than good intentions. It requires equipping.

Unfortunately, I’ve seen churches assign leaders hastily, valuing expansion over formation, visibility over depth. The pressure to grow numerically can sometimes lead to spiritual shortcuts. But discipleship isn’t fast. It takes time, care, and faithful guidance.

Wesley warned against what we might call “cheap grace” — the idea that one could receive the benefits of salvation without being changed by it. That warning still rings true. We need to be mindful of what we’re inviting people into. It’s not just church attendance or polite fellowship. It’s a lifelong journey of following Jesus.

And yet now, in this present season, I find myself without a small group. Not by choice, really. Life, transitions, and location have made community harder to find. But the desire remains perhaps more now than before. I find myself longing for a space where I can be known, challenged, and encouraged again. A space to ask and be asked: How is it with your soul?

Final Thoughts

Discipleship is slow, often hidden work. It requires attention, vulnerability, and a community that’s willing to walk together in grace and truth. John Wesley understood that. His small group structures were not merely pragmatic tools. They were theological statements. They bore witness to a vision of the Church not just as a gathered crowd, but as a growing body.

And that vision still speaks.

In a world of quick fixes and shallow connections, Wesley’s method reminds us that spiritual maturity isn’t accidental. It’s cultivated. And it’s cultivated best when we walk together.

This reflection was originally published on Medium under the “Even Here” publication.
Read it there → Even Here

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

Share

When I entered seminary, I thought church history would be something I studied from a distance: names, dates, and dusty controversies I’d memorize for an exam and then set aside. I didn’t expect it to speak to my present faith, let alone my past.

But the more I read, the more I found myself in the questions it raised. I had already been grappling with objections to Christianity some from outside the Church, but many from within. What I didn’t expect was that so many of those same questions had already been asked before. The early church wasn’t afraid to wrestle with mystery. In fact, much of what we believe today was formed because they did.

Take the question of who Jesus really is. Reading about Athanasius and his defense against Arianism felt surprisingly relevant. His insistence on the full divinity of Christ wasn’t just a theological stance. It was a fight for the heart of the gospel. What moved me was how he argued from Scripture without distorting it, refusing to compromise truth for the sake of peace. And at the Council of Chalcedon, when the Church affirmed that Jesus is both fully God and fully human, it helped give language to what I already sensed: that mystery and clarity can coexist, and that some truths are worth guarding.

I had never realized how much of our theology was born out of tension. Even the doctrine of the Trinity emerged from opposing views with some emphasizing Jesus’s deity, others his distinction from the Father. And somehow, through this struggle, the Church articulated a belief in one God in three persons. I still don’t fully understand it. But I’ve come to believe it not only because of creeds and councils, but because I’ve known the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit personally. Slowly, even the Holy Spirit, who felt most abstract to me, became someone I could relate to as a person.

Seeing how the creeds were formed not only helped clarify my own beliefs. It also reminded me of their original purpose. They weren’t just for the learned; they were tools to teach new converts, to summarize the essentials of the faith. They weren’t just for reciting; they were meant to be lived, defended, and passed on.

Even the parts of church history I once dismissed began to make sense. I had a negative view of monasticism. Why escape the world when God called us into it? But learning about how monastic communities preserved the Scriptures during the Dark Ages softened that view. I may not agree with a monastic lifestyle today, but I’ve come to understand the hunger for holiness, and the need for solitude now and then.

Then came the Reformation. Martin Luther’s story felt both jarring and necessary. He didn’t intend to start a new movement. He wanted reformation, not division. And yet, what emerged reshaped Christianity. His emphasis on the Five Solas, especially Scripture alone as our highest authority, offered a needed corrective to misplaced trust in human institutions. Not because it dismisses the Church, but because it places God above all human authority. When churches or pastors or even I fail, God doesn’t.

But of course, the Reformation didn’t solve everything. It splintered the Church even further, as disagreements on baptism, communion, and salvation led to new denominations. At times, this fragmentation can feel disheartening. I’ve often wondered where I stand, especially when I see value in more than one view. But I’ve come to realize: following Jesus isn’t about having perfect doctrine. It’s not about choosing the right label. It’s about staying anchored in the essentials, and loving one another even in our differences.

I grew up in a church my grandfather helped start, shaped by a strong sense of mission and a deep openness to the work of the Holy Spirit. I didn’t question that foundation for many years, not until I found myself asking new theological questions and encountering other traditions. I didn’t yet understand how the various streams of Christianity fit together. It’s only now, through studying church history, that I’ve come to see the larger story. While I no longer fully identify with the tradition I grew up in, I can see its sincere desire to make sense of the Spirit’s ongoing work in a believer’s life. I still believe He moves. I still long for revival. But I’ve also learned, as Jonathan Edwards warned, that revival without discernment can drift into extremism.

I no longer attend the interdenominational church that shaped much of my theological curiosity in those early years, simply because I now live in a different city. But I still carry with me something it taught me deeply, that we can “major on the majors and minor on the minors.” That phrase offered a framework for holding core doctrines with conviction while allowing space for diversity and dialogue on secondary issues. It helped me make peace with not fitting neatly into one tradition and gave me the freedom to seek truth without fear of disloyalty. Even now, as I navigate faith from a new place geographically and spiritually, that posture of humility and unity continues to guide me.

Church history hasn’t just shaped my theology. It’s helped me become more patient with mystery, more grounded in truth, and more generous toward those who differ. I’m not done learning. But I know this much: I belong to Christ. And whatever branch of the Church I find myself in, I walk alongside others who call Him Lord.

This reflection was originally published on Medium under the “Even Here” publication.
Read it there → Even Here

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

Share

This piece is written as a prayer rather than an essay. It’s raw, unfinished, and comes from the middle of waiting. I offer it here in the hope that others who feel the same might know they are not alone.

“Whom have I in heaven but You?
And earth has nothing I desire besides You.
My flesh and my heart may fail,
but God is the strength of my heart
and my portion forever.”
 — Psalm 73:25–26

Lord,
Why am I the way I am?
Why don’t I have the kind of drive others seem to carry so effortlessly?
Why do I struggle to know what I want, to name a clear path forward?

I look around and see people chasing dreams, working toward goals, building lives with certainty and direction.
But I often feel suspended… adrift… unable to tell which way is up.
It’s not that I don’t want to live meaningfully.
It’s that I can’t seem to name what that would even look like anymore.

I’ve asked You again and again:
What am I good at? What do I do with what’s in my hands?
How can I walk into a future I cannot see, with gifts I cannot name?

And You remain… quiet.

I won’t lie, Lord.
Sometimes it crosses my mind that You are cruel.
Not because You are, but because it feels that way when You hold back what I long for.
And yet, even that thought I cannot fully entertain…
Because I have known You.
Known You as kind.
As gentle.
As patient with my aching, my stumbling, my delays.

You’ve always taken care of me.
Even when I didn’t know what I needed.
Even when I didn’t know how to ask.
Even now, when I can barely speak.

I know You love me, even if I don’t feel it today.
I know You’re with me, even if You do not answer.
I know Your mercy is still holding me together, even as my questions fall apart.
And I know that no one else can bear the weight of these cries but You.

So I come again,
not with solutions,
not with requests,
but with empty hands.

You disappoint me, Lord.
And still, You are my everything.

I don’t know what to ask anymore.
But maybe that, too, is prayer.
Maybe it’s enough that I show up.
That I turn to You even in my confusion.
That I wait, not because I see the way forward, but because I believe You do.

Let this waiting be worship.
Let this aching be an altar.
Let this confusion be a kind of trust.

Because even now, You are still God.
Even now, You are still here.
Even here, I am still Yours.

Amen.

If you’re in a season of waiting, confusion, or silence, I hope these words remind you that you are not alone. Sometimes, simply turning toward God is itself an act of faith. And sometimes, the most honest prayer is simply to keep showing up.

Leave a comment

Back in seminary, while studying church history, I remember beginning to grasp why the early church felt compelled to write down creeds. They weren’t simply flexing theological muscle or laying down rigid rules. They were trying to respond thoughtfully and pastorally to what they saw as real challenges to the faith. The creeds emerged not just as rebuttals to heresy, but also as tools of discipleship, anchoring new believers in a shared understanding of who Jesus is and what it means to follow Him in a world full of competing claims.

That still makes sense to me. But as I revisit those early formulations now, I find myself sitting with the question: How should we approach the creeds today, knowing both their historical role and the ways they’ve been used since?

The Creeds Were Pastoral, Not Just Doctrinal

It’s easy to forget that the early church didn’t yet have a neatly packaged New Testament or a universal way of explaining the Trinity. What they did have were stories about Jesus, the experience of the Spirit, and the need to stay rooted in what had been handed down.

The creeds arose from this crucible of necessity. The church was clarifying what it meant to follow the crucified and risen Christ, distinguishing the Christian story from Gnostic speculations, imperial ideologies, and theological shortcuts that undermined either Jesus’ divinity or His humanity.

They weren’t written in ivory towers. They were forged in the life of the church through prayer, conflict, Scripture, and community. At their heart, the creeds were declarations of worship before they became instruments of policing.

What If the Other Views Had Won?

This is something I used to wonder about. What direction might the church have taken if the more “alternative” views of Jesus, the Trinity, or salvation had shaped the core tradition instead?

It’s a valid question, especially when those early debates were not only theological but also political and cultural. Still, most of the early church wasn’t trying to suppress honest disagreement for the sake of control. They were convinced that certain views, however sincere, couldn’t sustain the good news of the gospel.

Even so, we would do well to remember that many of the “losing sides” were not malicious but thoughtful, sincere, and searching. This should give us a posture of humility, not superiority. Because the truth is, the church has always been more diverse, more complicated, and more contested than we tend to admit.

Were the Creeds Ever Meant to Exclude?

Over time, the purpose of the creeds shifted. What began as statements of unity and worship became, in some places, boundary markers used to determine who was in and who was out.

I don’t think the early church fathers imagined that their creeds would one day be wielded to enforce rigid uniformity. I don’t think they intended to use them to silence nuance or shut down honest wrestling. At least, not in the way it often happens today.

They were trying to protect a fragile and growing faith community. Today, however, creeds can be weaponized and used not to shepherd but to sort, not to teach but to divide. And that’s not faithfulness to their original spirit. That’s fear masquerading as certainty.

One Body, Many Expressions

When we look at the history that followed from East and West, to Protestant and Catholic, to the hundreds of denominations we see now, it’s tempting to feel discouraged. How could one faith fragment so much?

But maybe we’re asking the wrong question.

Paul’s image in 1 Corinthians 12 speaks of one body, many parts. What if we saw denominational differences not only as divisions but also as different organs — each offering something vital, even if incomplete? Some traditions remind us of holiness. Others embody grace. Some hold to sacrament. Others to Scripture. Some treasure tradition. Others lean into renewal.

No one tradition holds everything. But together, they might point more fully to the mystery of Christ.

So, What Do We Do with the Creeds Now?

Maybe we return to them not as checkpoints, but as prayers. Not as test questions, but as shared declarations of trust. Not as the last word, but as part of the church’s ongoing conversation.

We can honor their purpose without idolizing their form. We can let them shape us without letting them limit us. We can receive them as wisdom from the past, not as tools to gatekeep the future.

Final Thought

The church has never had a neat story. But it has always been carried through tension, through disagreement, through grace.

Maybe the creeds still belong, not because they settle every question, but because they remind us of what has always been central:
A crucified and risen Christ.
A Spirit still speaking.
A faith handed down in hope.
A body, still learning how to live as one.

Reflection Question:
How have creeds shaped your view of faith, and how might they be reclaimed? Not to control belief, but to anchor it in a shared story?

This reflection was originally published on Medium under the “Even Here” publication.
Read it there → Even Here

Leave a comment

Share

Based on Matthew 7:7–12

“Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you.”
— Matthew 7:7 (NRSV)

I’ve read this verse many times. Memorized it as a child. Recited it in prayer. And lately, I find myself returning to it not with certainty, but with questions.

Jesus says, ask and it will be given. Seek and you will find. Knock and the door will be opened. It sounds so clear, so reassuring. And yet, what do you do when you’ve asked, sought, knocked… and the door doesn’t open?

Or worse. What if it opens for someone else?

That’s the ache I don’t always know how to name.

I’ve asked for something good. Something not selfish or shallow. I’ve tried to believe. I’ve waited. And still, I’m here. Watching time pass, watching others receive what I’ve been praying for. The door seems firmly shut.

And so I start to wonder.

Is God listening?
Did I ask wrongly?
Am I being tested?
Or am I being told “no” but gently, with silence?

Is the Problem Me?

Sometimes it’s tempting to make sense of unanswered prayer by looking inward. Maybe I didn’t pray hard enough. Maybe I don’t have enough faith. Maybe God is disappointed in me. These are the quiet accusations that trail behind the silence.

But when Jesus spoke these words in Matthew 7, he didn’t add qualifiers. He didn’t say, “Ask perfectly.” He said, “Ask.” He didn’t say, “Seek only if your heart is pure.” He said, “Seek.” He didn’t say, “Knock, and only if you’re worthy, the door will open.” He said, “Knock.”

Not because God is a vending machine. But because God is a Father.

“If You, Evil as You Are…”

Jesus anchors this teaching in a striking image: If flawed, fallible parents still know how to give good gifts to their children, how much more will your heavenly Father give good things to those who ask Him?

This line, “if you, evil as you are…” is jarring. But it also makes the point unmistakable. God isn’t reluctant. He isn’t withholding to punish or tease. He gives, because giving is part of His nature. And still, what He gives might not always match what we asked for.

This is where it gets hard.

Because I’m not asking for stones or serpents. I’m asking for bread. Something good. Something that aligns with love, with life, with joy. And when the answer is delayed, or doesn’t come at all, it’s hard not to feel like I’ve been handed a rock.

When Hope Feels Like a Risk

To ask again, after disappointment, feels vulnerable. Like I’m putting my heart on the line with no guarantee of return.

But I think that’s exactly what Jesus invites us into. Not a formula, but a relationship. Not a transaction, but a trust. In fact, the original Greek grammar makes this even more clear. The verbs Jesus uses: “ask,” “seek,” “knock” are all in the present active tense.

A more faithful rendering, as captured in translations like the NLT, might be:
“Keep on asking. Keep on seeking. Keep on knocking.”

It’s not a one-time request. It’s a posture of persistence. Of returning again and again, even when the answers don’t come quickly. Even when they don’t come clearly.

And yet, doesn’t it feel unfair?
To keep asking, seeking, knocking… and for the door to stay closed? To feel like you’ve done your part and heaven remains silent? That question sits uncomfortably at the heart of faith: Why ask at all, if the answer might still be no?

Jesus doesn’t give a simple explanation. But He does give an image: a good Father who knows how to give good gifts. This is not a lesson in divine logic. It’s an invitation to trust the Giver, even when the gift is unclear.

He doesn’t promise us what we want. He promises us a God who listens. A God who gives. A God who knows how to be a good parent even when we don’t understand His timing or His answers.

A Prayer for the Waiting

Lord, you said to ask but I am tired of asking.
You said to seek but I feel like I’ve only found silence.
You said to knock but the door hasn’t opened.

And still, I come again. Not with polished faith, but with trembling trust.
Help me to believe that you are good, even when the answer is unclear.
Teach me to ask persistently, without shame.
To seek you, not just outcomes.
To knock, not just to gain entry, but to stay near to your heart.

You are the Giver of good things.
Remind me of that, when hope grows dim.
Remind me of that, when the waiting stretches long.
And if the gift looks different than I imagined, help me see it still as grace.
Amen.

Leave a comment

Share